Home
/
Bills
/

C-219

HOUSEINCOMMITTEE
Private Member's Bill

45th Parliament · Session 1

Bill C-219: An Act to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act, the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Sergei Magnitsky Law), the Special Economic Measures Act and the Broadcasting Act

Sergei Magnitsky International Anti-Corruption and Human Rights Act

Introduced

September 16, 2025

Current Stage

HouseInCommittee

Last Updated

February 24, 2026

Sponsor

James Bezan

Community Support

Community Vote

0% Support

0 votes

Support

Undecided/Abstain

Oppose

Cast Your Vote

Your vote helps inform others

Engagement

Votes

0

Comments

0

Follows

0

Parliamentary Votes

0

Statements

13

Bill C-219

Tue Feb 24 2026

An Act to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act, the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Sergei Magnitsky Law), the Special Economic Measures Act and the Broadcasting Act

Impact Rating

3/5

Short Summary

Strengthens sanctions laws, bans visas for families of corrupt officials, renames the Special Economic Measures Act, and revokes licenses of state-influenced foreign broadcasters.

Sanctions
Human Rights
Transnational Repression
Broadcasting
Visas

This Private Member's Bill amends Canada's foreign policy and sanctions laws to strengthen measures against human rights abusers and corrupt foreign officials. It renames the Special Economic Measures Act to the Sergei Magnitsky Global Sanctions Act and introduces 'transnational repression' (intimidating people across borders) as grounds for sanctions. The bill also bans visas for the immediate family members of sanctioned individuals, mandates annual reporting on 'prisoners of conscience,' and requires the revocation of broadcasting licenses for foreign media outlets influenced by sanctioned entities or those involved in genocide.

Why does this bill exist?

Origin (Platform Promise)

This bill stems from ongoing concerns regarding foreign interference in Canada and a desire to strengthen the existing Magnitsky laws, championed by the sponsor James Bezan.

  • Renames the Special Economic Measures Act to the Sergei Magnitsky Global Sanctions Act.

  • Adds 'transnational repression' (foreign states harassing people in Canada) as a specific reason to impose sanctions.

  • Prohibits issuing visas to immediate family members of sanctioned foreign nationals, unless they did not financially benefit from that person.

  • Requires the Minister of Foreign Affairs to publish an annual list of 'prisoners of conscience' the government is trying to release.

  • Mandates the immediate revocation of broadcasting licenses for entities influenced by foreign nationals who are sanctioned or have committed genocide.

  • Requires the Minister to respond publicly when a parliamentary committee recommends sanctions against a specific individual.

  • Increases the maximum fine for certain summary conviction offences under the sanctions law from $25,000 to $100,000.

Diaspora Communities

(Rights Expanded)

Will receive better protection from 'transnational repression' (harassment by their home countries) through new sanction powers.

Foreign Broadcasters

(Harder)

State-linked media outlets (like RT or others) will lose their license to broadcast in Canada if their controlling entities are sanctioned.

Families of Foreign Officials

(Rights Restricted)

Spouses and children of sanctioned individuals will be denied Canadian visas unless they prove financial independence.

Provincial Impact

Provincial Impact

None (Purely Federal) Interaction

Foreign policy, immigration, and broadcasting are federal jurisdictions.

Benefits & Pros

Strengthens Canada's ability to protect diaspora communities from harassment by foreign governments.

Prevents Canada from becoming a safe haven for the families of corrupt officials or human rights abusers.

Increases transparency by requiring the government to report on political prisoners and respond to sanction recommendations from Parliament.

Prevents foreign propaganda outlets linked to sanctioned regimes from broadcasting in Canada.

Beneficiaries

Diaspora communities in Canada
Human rights activists
Political dissidents
Prisoners of conscience

Risks & Cons

Defining 'prisoners of conscience' can be politically subjective and may complicate diplomatic relations.

Banning family members could face legal challenges regarding guilt by association if they are not personally involved in corruption.

The broadcasting ban is broad and could potentially be used to target media outlets based on political disagreements rather than clear evidence of harm.

Requires increased administrative resources for Global Affairs Canada to track family connections and produce annual reports.

Affected Groups

Corrupt foreign officials
Immediate family members of sanctioned individuals
Foreign state-controlled media outlets

Before & After

Currently, a corrupt foreign official might be sanctioned, but their spouse could still potentially get a visa to shop or live in Canada. Under this bill, that spouse would be automatically denied a visa unless they prove they are financially independent of the official.

Real World Scenario

Currently: A journalist who fled Country X is being harassed in Canada by agents of Country X. The government can sanction the agents but the law doesn't explicitly name this behavior. Under this Bill: The law explicitly defines this harassment as 'transnational repression,' allowing for targeted sanctions against the officials responsible, and bans their families from visiting Canada.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sponsor

James Bezan

Member of Parliament

House of Commons

First reading

Completed on September 16, 2025

Second reading

Completed on February 24, 2026

Consideration in committee

In Progress

Report stage

Not yet started

Third reading

Not yet started

Senate

First reading

Not yet started

Second reading

Not yet started

Third reading

Not yet started

Abuse Potential

The provision to revoke broadcasting licenses for undertakings 'vulnerable to being significantly influenced' by sanctioned entities is somewhat vague. A future government could theoretically use this to silence foreign news outlets that are critical of Canadian policy but not necessarily spreading disinformation, simply by linking them loosely to a sanctioned individual. Additionally, the discretion in defining 'prisoners of conscience' could be used selectively to ignore abuses by allied nations.

Implementation Risk

There is a risk of diplomatic retaliation from countries whose officials or media outlets are targeted. Verifying whether family members received 'financial benefit' from a sanctioned individual will be difficult for immigration officers to prove.

Broad Economic Impact

None

Everyday Life

Minimal impact

Admin Burden

None for citizens, increased reporting duties for government officials.

Timeline

Immediate upon Royal Assent.