45th Parliament · Session 1
Bill C-9: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places)
Combatting Hate Act
Introduced
September 19, 2025
Current Stage
SenateInCommittee
Last Updated
April 30, 2026
Sponsor
Sean Fraser
Community Support
Community Vote
50% Support
4 votes
Politicians' Vote
56% Support
333 MPs
Support
Undecided/Abstain
Oppose
Cast Your Vote
Your vote helps inform others
Engagement
Votes
4
Comments
0
Follows
2
Parliamentary Votes
3
Statements
716
Bill C-9
Thu Apr 30 2026
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places)
Impact Rating
4/5
Short Summary
Creates a specific 'Hate Crime' offence, bans public displays of Nazi and terrorist symbols, and criminalizes blocking access to places of worship.
This bill introduces stricter criminal laws to fight hate speech and hate crimes in Canada. It creates a new standalone 'Hate Crime' offence with harsher penalties for crimes motivated by bias. It also bans the public display of hate symbols (specifically Nazi swastikas, SS bolts, and symbols of terrorist groups) and creates 'safe access zones' around places of worship and community centers, making it illegal to block entry or intimidate people there.
Why does this bill exist?
Origin (Public Outcry/Event)
Response to a significant rise in antisemitism, Islamophobia, and hate crimes in Canada, particularly protests targeting places of worship and schools.
Repeals the requirement for the Attorney General's consent to prosecute hate propaganda, making it easier for local police to lay charges.
Criminalizes the public display of the Nazi Hakenkreuz (swastika), SS bolts, or symbols of listed terrorist entities if used to promote hatred.
Creates a new standalone 'Hate Crime' offence: if you commit a crime (like assault) motivated by hate, it becomes a distinct, more serious charge.
Establishes 'Safe Access Zones': It is now a specific crime to block access to or intimidate people at places of worship, religious schools, or cultural centers.
Clarifies the legal definition of 'hatred' as 'detestation or vilification' rather than just dislike or offense.
Provides legal defences for using hate symbols if the purpose is educational, religious, journalistic, or artistic.
Religious Communities
(Rights Expanded)
Gains legal protection against intimidation and blockades at their places of worship and schools.
Protesters
(Harder)
Can no longer block access to or intimidate people at community centers or cemeteries without risking 10 years in prison.
Police and Prosecutors
(Easier)
Can lay hate propaganda charges immediately without waiting for permission from the federal Attorney General.
Provincial Impact
Provincial Impact
Criminal law is federal, but provincial police and courts are responsible for enforcing these new offences.
Benefits & Pros
Provides stronger legal tools to protect minority communities from harassment at their places of worship and schools.
Recognizes the unique harm caused by hate-motivated crimes by creating a specific offence rather than just a sentencing consideration.
Prevents the public glorification of ideologies (Nazism, terrorism) that are fundamentally opposed to Canadian values.
Removing the Attorney General consent requirement allows for faster legal action against hate speech.
Beneficiaries
Risks & Cons
Removing the Attorney General's consent requirement removes a 'check and balance,' potentially leading to frivolous prosecutions by local authorities.
Banning symbols can be difficult to enforce fairly (e.g., distinguishing between a hate symbol and an educational context).
Potential conflict with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms regarding freedom of expression.
Increased prison sentences increase costs without necessarily addressing the root causes of radicalization.
Affected Groups
Before & After
Currently: If someone vandalizes a mosque, they are charged with 'Mischief'. The judge might increase the sentence because it was hate-motivated, but the crime on their record is just 'Mischief'. Under this Bill: The person would be charged with the specific offence of 'Hate Crime', carrying a potentially longer sentence and a specific criminal record label.
Real World Scenario
Currently: A group protests outside a synagogue, shouting slurs and blocking the doors. Police charge them with minor disturbances, but need federal permission to lay hate charges. Under this Bill: Police can immediately charge them with the new offence of 'Intimidation/Blocking Access' (up to 10 years jail) and 'Wilful Promotion of Hatred' without federal permission.
Frequently Asked Questions
Votes on this bill
3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places)
Wed Mar 25 2026
Yeas: 186
Nays: 137
Total: 333
Bill C-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places) (recommittal to a committee)
Wed Mar 25 2026
Yeas: 125
Nays: 188
Total: 323
Concurrence at report stage of Bill C-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places)
Mon Mar 23 2026
Yeas: 188
Nays: 144
Total: 336
Sponsor
Member of Parliament
House of Commons
First reading
Completed on September 19, 2025
Second reading
Completed on October 1, 2025
Consideration in committee
Completed on March 13, 2026
Report stage
Completed on March 23, 2026
Third reading
Completed on March 25, 2026
Senate
First reading
Completed on March 26, 2026
Second reading
Completed on April 30, 2026
Consideration in committee
In Progress
Report stage
Not yet started
Third reading
Not yet started
Abuse Potential
The removal of the Attorney General's consent requirement (Section 3) is the most significant risk. Previously, a high-level political check prevented frivolous hate speech charges. Without it, local police or prosecutors could theoretically charge individuals for controversial but legal speech, dragging them through expensive court processes before the charges are dropped. Additionally, the 'safe access' laws could be used to suppress legitimate protests near community centers or schools if police interpret 'impeding access' or 'intimidation' too broadly.
Implementation Risk
Moderate. There will likely be Charter challenges (freedom of expression) against the ban on symbols, which could lead to parts of the law being struck down by courts.
Broad Economic Impact
None.
Everyday Life
Minimal impact. Law-abiding citizens will see no change.
Admin Burden
Moderate. Courts will need to adapt to the new 'Hate Crime' offence structure.
Timeline
The law takes effect 30 days after it receives Royal Assent.