45th Parliament · Session 1
Bill C-242: An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Department of Justice Act
Jail Not Bail Act
Introduced
September 22, 2025
Current Stage
BillDefeated
Last Updated
March 25, 2026
Sponsor
Arpan Khanna
Community Support
Community Vote
0% Support
0 votes
Politicians' Vote
40% Support
339 MPs
Support
Undecided/Abstain
Oppose
Cast Your Vote
Your vote helps inform others
Engagement
Votes
0
Comments
0
Follows
0
Parliamentary Votes
1
Statements
78
Bill C-242
Wed Mar 25 2026
An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Department of Justice Act
Impact Rating
4/5
Short Summary
This bill makes it significantly harder for people accused of crimes to get bail, shifting the justice system's focus from releasing accused individuals to prioritizing public safety.
This bill makes sweeping changes to Canada's bail system to keep more individuals accused of crimes in jail while they wait for their trials. It changes the core legal principle of bail from 'restraint'—which means trying to keep people out of jail before they are proven guilty—to prioritizing the protection and safety of the public. It makes it much harder to get bail for violent crimes, introduces strict rules for repeat offenders, and forces non-citizens to hand over their passports if they are granted release. The goal is to end what critics call a 'catch and release' justice system.
Why does this bill exist?
Origin (Public Outcry/Event)
This bill is a direct response to highly publicized incidents where individuals out on bail committed serious or fatal crimes, sparking public anger over the current justice system.
Replaces the legal principle of 'restraint' with 'public protection', instructing judges to prioritize public safety over releasing the accused.
Lowers the bar for denying bail: judges can hold someone if it is 'reasonably foreseeable' they will reoffend, rather than requiring a 'substantial likelihood'.
Forces individuals accused of violent crimes, including violence against first responders, to prove why they should be released, rather than making the Crown prove why they should be held.
Creates a mandatory rule that non-citizens and temporary residents must surrender their passports if they are granted bail.
Bans anyone convicted of a major crime in the past 10 years from acting as a surety (the person who guarantees an accused will show up for court).
Automatically cancels bail and sends the person to jail if they plead guilty or are found guilty of a serious crime while waiting to be sentenced.
Requires the federal government to publish an annual report tracking bail statistics, repeat offences, and broken bail conditions.
Everyday citizens
(Neutral)
Will not change daily routines, but aims to increase general safety in communities by keeping repeat offenders off the streets.
Non-citizens and Temporary Residents
(Rights Restricted)
Will face stricter scrutiny during bail hearings and will be legally required to hand over their passports to the government if released.
First Responders
(Rights Expanded)
Gains specific recognition in the Criminal Code, meaning violence against them will trigger much harsher bail conditions for their attackers.
Provincial Impact
Provincial Impact
Provinces are responsible for managing pre-trial detention centers (jails). Because this bill will result in thousands more people being denied bail, provinces will bear the massive financial and logistical burden of feeding, housing, and guarding them.
Benefits & Pros
Keeps dangerous and repeat offenders off the streets while they await trial, directly improving community safety.
Provides specific legal recognition and protection for paramedics, firefighters, and police officers.
Lowers the risk of accused individuals fleeing the country by seizing passports from non-citizens.
Beneficiaries
Risks & Cons
Could lead to severely overcrowded provincial jails filled with people who have not yet been convicted of a crime.
Weakens the presumption of innocence by making it easier to lock people up based on a prediction of what they might do.
May disproportionately impact marginalized groups and newcomers by creating stricter release rules for non-citizens.
Affected Groups
Before & After
Currently, judges are required by law to prioritize keeping accused people out of jail before trial unless there is a strong reason to hold them. Under this bill, judges would be forced to prioritize public safety first and hold more people in jail while they wait for their trial.
Real World Scenario
Currently: A person with a criminal record arrested for robbery might be released on bail because a judge believes there is no 'substantial likelihood' they will reoffend before trial. Under this Bill: The judge could deny bail and keep them in jail simply by concluding it is 'reasonably foreseeable' they might commit another crime.
Frequently Asked Questions
Votes on this bill
2nd reading of Bill C-242, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Department of Justice Act
Wed Mar 25 2026
Yeas: 136
Nays: 193
Total: 339
Sponsor
Member of Parliament
House of Commons
First reading
Completed on September 22, 2025
Second reading
Not yet started
Consideration in committee
Not yet started
Report stage
Not yet started
Third reading
Not yet started
Senate
First reading
Not yet started
Second reading
Not yet started
Third reading
Not yet started
Abuse Potential
The bill changes the legal standard to deny bail from a 'substantial likelihood' that someone will commit a crime to whether it is 'reasonably foreseeable'. This language is incredibly vague. A judge could theoretically use this lower standard to deny bail based on gut feelings, personal biases, or assumptions about a person's background, rather than hard evidence. Because bail denies a person their freedom before they are proven guilty, lowering this threshold risks the mass detention of legally innocent people. Furthermore, automatically banning anyone with a decade-old criminal record from being a surety could unfairly punish rehabilitated individuals who are trying to support a family member through the justice system.
Implementation Risk
The largest risk is an immediate crisis of overcrowding in provincial jails, many of which are already operating above capacity. A sudden influx of inmates could lead to unsafe conditions, riots, and the need for emergency funding. Additionally, the law will likely face immediate Supreme Court challenges arguing it violates the Charter right not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause.
Broad Economic Impact
Indirect Cost/Benefit, as taxpayers will fund the increased costs of housing more inmates in provincial detention centers.
Everyday Life
Minimal impact for the average law-abiding citizen, though it addresses widespread concerns about community safety.
Admin Burden
Automatic, no paperwork for the general public.
Timeline
Immediate upon Royal Assent.