Home
/
Bills
/

S-205

HOUSEAT2NDREADING
Private Member's Bill
Senate

45th Parliament · Session 1

Bill S-205: An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act

Providing Alternatives to Isolation and Ensuring Oversight and Remedies in the Correctional System Act (Tona’s Law)

Introduced

May 28, 2025

Current Stage

HouseAt2ndReading

Last Updated

May 28, 2026

Community Support

Community Vote

0% Support

0 votes

Support

Undecided/Abstain

Oppose

Cast Your Vote

Your vote helps inform others

Engagement

Votes

0

Comments

0

Follows

0

Parliamentary Votes

0

Statements

1

Bill S-205

Thu May 28 2026

An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act

Impact Rating

4/5

Short Summary

This bill limits solitary confinement to 48 hours, mandates hospital transfers for severely mentally ill inmates, and allows sentence reductions for unfair prison treatment.

Justice System
Mental Health
Human Rights
Healthcare
Security

This bill proposes major reforms to Canada's federal prison system to protect the human rights and mental health of inmates. It strictly limits the use of solitary confinement, requiring a judge's approval if an inmate needs to be isolated for more than 48 hours. It also mandates that inmates with severe mental health issues be transferred out of prisons and into hospitals. Additionally, it allows inmates to apply to a court to have their sentences reduced if they can prove they were treated unfairly or discriminated against by the prison system.

Why does this bill exist?

Origin (Public Outcry/Event)

This bill is a response to long-standing advocacy, human rights reports, and previous court rulings regarding the psychological damage caused by solitary confinement and the inadequate mental health care provided in federal prisons.

  • Requires prison officials to refer new inmates for a mental health assessment within 30 days of arrival.

  • Mandates that inmates diagnosed with disabling mental health issues be transferred from federal prisons to hospitals or mental health facilities.

  • Limits confinement in a Structured Intervention Unit (the modern version of solitary confinement) to a maximum of 48 hours, unless a superior court judge approves an extension.

  • Expands community release and rehabilitation programs, previously focused mostly on Indigenous communities, to include groups serving disadvantaged or minority populations.

  • Creates a new legal pathway for inmates to apply to the court that sentenced them for a reduction in their sentence or parole waiting period if they were subjected to unfair, unjust, or discriminatory treatment by prison authorities.

Inmates

(Rights Expanded)

Will have strict legal protections against long-term isolation, guaranteed access to hospital transfers for severe mental illness, and a new right to sue for early release based on unfair treatment.

Healthcare Workers

(Harder)

Nurses and doctors in public psychiatric facilities may suddenly be required to treat and house transferred federal inmates, raising safety and capacity concerns.

Correctional Staff

(Harder)

Will lose the authority to keep disruptive or dangerous inmates in isolation beyond 48 hours without navigating a complex court approval process.

Provincial Impact

Provincial Impact

High (Requires Provincial Action/Funding) Interaction

While prisons are federal, hospitals and superior courts are provincial. Provinces will face the heavy burden of securely housing federal inmates in their hospitals and dealing with a surge of emergency 48-hour court hearings for isolation extensions.

Benefits & Pros

Ensures that severely mentally ill individuals receive proper medical care in a hospital setting rather than being managed with punishment or isolation in a prison.

Adds strong judicial oversight to the use of isolation, preventing prison officials from keeping inmates in solitary-like conditions indefinitely.

Provides a tangible legal remedy for inmates who face abuse, discrimination, or unjust treatment while incarcerated.

Helps minority and marginalized groups reintegrate into society by allowing them to serve parts of their sentence in supportive community environments.

Beneficiaries

Federal inmates
Prisoners rights advocates
Community organizations serving minority groups

Risks & Cons

Could pose a severe safety risk to hospital staff and the public if violent federal inmates are transferred to standard provincial hospitals that lack high-level security.

The new sentence reduction rule could be used as a loophole by dangerous offenders to get out of prison early by claiming administrative unfairness.

Requiring a superior court judge to approve isolation extensions within 48 hours will place a massive logistical and financial burden on the court system.

Affected Groups

Correctional Service Canada staff
Provincial healthcare systems and public hospitals
Superior courts (due to increased caseloads)

Before & After

Currently, prison officials can hold inmates in isolation units for extended periods to manage facility safety, and mentally ill inmates often remain in prison receiving limited internal care. Under this bill, isolation beyond 48 hours requires a court order, and severely mentally ill inmates must be physically transferred to outside hospitals.

Real World Scenario

Currently: An inmate experiencing a severe mental health crisis who becomes violent might be placed in an isolation unit for weeks to protect staff and other inmates. Under this Bill: The prison could only isolate them for 48 hours without a judge's permission, and they would be legally forced to transfer the inmate to an outside psychiatric hospital for treatment.

Frequently Asked Questions
House of Commons

First reading

Completed on May 28, 2026

Second reading

Not yet started

Consideration in committee

Not yet started

Report stage

Not yet started

Third reading

Not yet started

Senate

First reading

Completed on May 28, 2025

Second reading

Completed on October 21, 2025

Consideration in committee

Completed on March 24, 2026

Report stage

Completed on April 21, 2026

Third reading

Completed on April 28, 2026

Abuse Potential

The bill introduces a clause allowing inmates to apply for a sentence reduction if a decision by the prison system was 'unreasonable, unjust, oppressive or improperly discriminatory.' Because these terms are broad, this could lead to a flood of frivolous court applications from inmates seeking early release for minor administrative grievances, overwhelming the courts. Additionally, the mandate to transfer inmates with disabling mental health issues to hospitals is legally absolute. Clever inmates could exaggerate mental health symptoms to force a transfer out of a high-security penitentiary into a lower-security public hospital, potentially creating escape risks or endangering civilian healthcare workers.

Implementation Risk

The logistical risk is extremely high. Superior courts do not operate 24/7, making it incredibly difficult for rural or remote prisons to get a judge's approval within the strict 48-hour window. Furthermore, provincial hospitals may simply refuse to accept violent federal inmates due to a lack of secure infrastructure, leading to jurisdictional standoffs.

Broad Economic Impact

Indirect

Everyday Life

Minimal impact

Admin Burden

High administrative burden for the courts, prisons, and hospitals that must coordinate rapid legal hearings and high-security medical transfers.

Timeline

Immediate upon Royal Assent.