HOUSEAT2NDREADING
Senate

45th Parliament · Session 1

Bill S-5: An Act respecting the interoperability of health information technology and to prohibit data blocking by health information technology vendors

Connected Care for Canadians Act

Introduced

February 4, 2026

Current Stage

HouseAt2ndReading

Last Updated

May 28, 2026

Community Support

Community Vote

0% Support

0 votes

Support

Undecided/Abstain

Oppose

Cast Your Vote

Your vote helps inform others

Engagement

Votes

0

Comments

0

Follows

0

Parliamentary Votes

0

Statements

30

Bill S-5

Thu May 28 2026

An Act respecting the interoperability of health information technology and to prohibit data blocking by health information technology vendors

Impact Rating

3/5

Short Summary

This bill forces healthcare software companies to ensure medical records can be securely shared between doctors and hospitals, banning data blocking to improve patient care across Canada.

Healthcare
Medical Records
Technology
Data Privacy
Provincial Relations

The Connected Care for Canadians Act aims to fix a major frustration in the healthcare system: medical records that cannot be easily shared between different doctors, hospitals, and clinics. This bill forces companies that create health software and databases to ensure their systems can securely communicate with each other. It strictly prohibits data blocking, a practice where technology companies intentionally make it difficult to access or exchange a patient's electronic health information. The federal government will only apply these rules in provinces or territories that do not already have similar or stronger laws in place.

Why does this bill exist?

Origin (Public Outcry/Event)

Response to long-standing complaints from patients and doctors about fragmented medical records and the inability to share life-saving information across different hospitals.

  • Requires health information technology vendors to make their systems interoperable, meaning they must easily and securely share patient data.

  • Officially bans data blocking, preventing tech companies from restricting access to or exchange of electronic health records.

  • Allows the federal government to impose financial penalties on companies that break these rules.

  • Only applies in provinces and territories that do not already have their own laws matching or exceeding these federal standards.

  • Gives the Minister of Health the power to verify compliance and investigate complaints against health software vendors.

Everyday citizens

(Easier)

Will no longer need to manually transfer health records or worry that a new doctor cannot see their medical history.

Healthcare Workers

(Easier)

Can quickly access a patient's complete medical history, test results, and prescriptions from different clinics and hospitals.

Business owners

(Harder)

Health software developers must redesign systems to meet strict new federal data-sharing standards or face financial penalties.

Provincial Impact

Provincial Impact

High (Requires Provincial Action/Funding) Interaction

Healthcare is a provincial responsibility. The federal government will only enforce this law if a province fails to establish its own similar rules. Provinces may need to update their own privacy laws or fund software upgrades for their hospitals to meet the new standard.

Benefits & Pros

Patients will not have to repeatedly explain their medical history or transfer physical files when seeing new specialists.

Doctors will have faster, more complete access to life-saving health data during emergencies.

Prevents tech monopolies from holding hospital data hostage or charging hidden fees for data access.

Beneficiaries

Patients
Doctors and nurses
Healthcare administrators

Risks & Cons

Upgrading old hospital software to meet new federal standards could be expensive and time-consuming.

Creating a highly connected flow of health data increases the risk and potential severity of cyberattacks or data leaks.

Could cause political friction, as healthcare administration is traditionally managed by provincial governments, not the federal government.

Affected Groups

Health software vendors
Medical tech companies with outdated systems

Before & After

Currently, if a patient visits a walk-in clinic, their family doctor or a hospital specialist might not be able to see the notes or test results because the clinics use different software. Under this bill, the companies making that software are legally required to ensure the systems can securely share that information with each other.

Real World Scenario

Currently: A patient takes a blood test at a private lab, but the hospital ER cannot easily access the results because the lab's software blocks data sharing. Under this Bill: The software vendor must ensure the hospital system can securely retrieve those test results, or face federal fines.

Frequently Asked Questions
House of Commons

First reading

Completed on May 28, 2026

Second reading

Not yet started

Consideration in committee

Not yet started

Report stage

Not yet started

Third reading

Not yet started

Senate

First reading

Completed on February 4, 2026

Second reading

Completed on March 26, 2026

Consideration in committee

Completed on April 30, 2026

Report stage

Completed on May 5, 2026

Third reading

Completed on May 26, 2026

Abuse Potential

The bill grants the federal Cabinet significant power to decide when and where to apply these rules. Section 7 allows the federal government to impose this law on a province if Cabinet unilaterally decides the province's existing rules are not substantially similar to the federal standard. This could be used as a political tool to interfere in healthcare, a fiercely guarded provincial jurisdiction. Additionally, the exact definition of data blocking is left to future regulations. If written too broadly, the government could unfairly penalize software companies for legitimate security measures, interpreting standard privacy lock-downs as illegal data blocking. Furthermore, sweeping investigative powers granted to the Minister of Health to verify compliance could lead to intrusive audits of private technology companies without sufficient independent oversight.

Implementation Risk

Highly risky due to provincial jurisdiction. Provinces may push back against federal interference in healthcare administration. Additionally, creating a unified technical standard across hundreds of different private software systems used nationwide is incredibly complex and prone to severe delays.

Broad Economic Impact

Indirect. May create costs for technology companies and provincial health authorities, but improves overall systemic efficiency.

Everyday Life

Moderate impact. Patients will experience smoother, safer medical appointments without having to act as the messenger for their own medical files.

Admin Burden

Automatic. Patients do not need to do anything; the burden falls entirely on health technology companies.

Timeline

Phased in over time as the federal government drafts specific technical regulations and assesses provincial laws.