Hansard #99
March 25, 2026
45th Parliament, 1st session
236 interventions
Quick Summary
The House focused on the final debate of Bill C-9, the Combatting Hate Act, which faced stiff opposition from the Conservative Party and the NDP over concerns regarding religious freedom and the criminalization of dissent. Additionally, the Conservative Party challenged the Liberal government on economic performance and an Auditor General report identifying 150,000 uninvestigated cases of immigration fraud.
Key Points
- Bill C-9 (Combatting Hate Act) reached its final stages, with the Conservative Party moving an amendment to restore the 'religious defense' for hate speech, which was removed at committee.
- The NDP joined the Conservative Party in opposing Bill C-9, though for different reasons, citing concerns that vague standards for 'fear' and 'intimidation' would lead to the over-policing of marginalized communities and protesters.
- The Leader of the Opposition, Pierre Poilievre, confronted Prime Minister Mark Carney regarding an Auditor General report that found 150,000 suspected fraud cases in the international student program went uninvestigated.
- The Speaker of the House ruled that three Conservative amendments to Bill C-8 (Cybersecurity) were null and void because they introduced a requirement for judicial oversight that was not contemplated in the original bill.
- The Bloc Québécois questioned the Prime Minister's commitment to state secularism after he quoted the Bible in a recent speech, while the government continues to challenge Quebec's Bill 21.
Productivity Assessment
Rating:
Reasoning: While Bill C-9 advanced through debate, the session was heavily dominated by procedural rulings and repetitive partisan talking points on the economy. Substantial time was spent on a Speaker's ruling that struck down previously adopted committee amendments.
Citizen Impact: Canadians may soon see stricter laws regarding hate speech and the protection of religious sites, though critics warn of potential impacts on freedom of expression. Economic debates highlight ongoing concerns over the cost of living and fuel prices.
In-depth Analysis
The session was marked by a significant procedural ruling and a deeply polarized debate on criminal law. The Speaker delivered a ruling on Bill C-8 (Cybersecurity), striking down several Conservative amendments that sought to require judicial authorization before a minister could issue certain orders; the Speaker determined these amendments improperly transferred executive authority to the judiciary, violating the bill's scope as defined at second reading. The primary legislative focus, Bill C-9 (Combatting Hate Act), saw the Liberal and Bloc Québécois members aligned in support of removing the 'religious defense' for hate speech to prevent individuals from using faith as a shield for promoting hatred. Conversely, the Conservative Party argued this removal would persecute people of faith for citing sacred texts, while the NDP expressed fears that the bill's vague language regarding 'intimidation' would be weaponized against Indigenous land defenders and peaceful protesters. Economic discourse remained stuck in a statistical tug-of-war: the Conservative MP's highlighted Canada as the only shrinking economy in the G7 with the highest food inflation, while the Liberal cabinet focused on high foreign direct investment and job growth relative to the United States.
Transparency and Accountability
The government was criticized for 'ramming' Bill C-9 through committee without sufficient witnesses. Similarly, the Prime Minister's refusal to provide specific answers regarding 150,000 fraud cases, instead repeating 'blessed with a strong cabinet,' was highlighted by the Conservative Party as a lack of accountability.
Votes and Outcomes
Motion: Conservative amendment to Bill C-9 to restore the religious defense in section 319 of the Criminal Code.
Significance: A recorded vote was requested, delaying the final decision on whether the bill will be sent back to committee.
Motion: Speaker's Ruling on Bill C-8 Amendments
Significance: Determined that CPC-2, CPC-5, and CPC-15 were null and void, meaning the bill proceeds without these judicial oversight requirements.
Citizen Relevance
Who is Affected: Religious communities (Jewish, Muslim, Christian, Sikh), Indigenous land defenders, and everyday Canadians concerned about fuel prices and immigration integrity.
Practical Implications: If Bill C-9 passes, obstructing access to a mosque or synagogue could lead to serious criminal charges. Economically, the government claims wage growth is outpacing inflation, while the Conservative Party warns of higher costs at the pump due to the fuel standard tax.
Timeline: Bill C-9 is nearing its final vote in the House before heading to the Senate. The Auditor General's report on immigration fraud will likely lead to further committee investigations in the coming months.
Next Steps
A recorded vote on the Conservative amendment to Bill C-9 is expected next session. If the amendment fails, the bill will likely pass third reading and move to the Senate. Bill C-8 will be reprinted without the voided amendments.
Notable Moments
- The Speaker rules three Conservative amendments to Bill C-8 'null and void.' (Impact: This ruling sets a precedent on the limits of committee amendments and prevents the judiciary from gaining 'veto' power over ministerial cybersecurity orders.)
- Anthony Housefather recounts incidents of synagogues being shot at in Toronto and the blocking of the Holocaust Museum in Montreal. (Impact: Provided the moral and practical justification for the Combatting Hate Act's specific focus on protecting religious sites.)