Thank you very much, Madam Chair.

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen members of the committee.

Thank you for inviting me to contribute to your discussion on the green economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.

My name is Jean-François Samray, and I am president and chief executive officer of the Quebec Forest Industry Council, which brings together sawmill, veneer, pulp, paper, cardboard and panel companies in Quebec, as well as engineered wood manufacturers.

Today, I want to stress not only the importance of the forest industry's role in our communities' economic recovery, but also the fact that it will be just as much of a key player in the fight against greenhouse gases, or GHGs. Various levels of government will be responsible for creating the context to enable the forest industry to participate fully in those two issues and to support its efforts in innovation, so that it can help reach our objectives.

The Quebec forest industry, which generates over 142,000 jobs, is the economic engine of some 900 municipalities. Nearly 70% of Quebec's municipalities are connected to that industry. The average annual income in the forest industry is $66,500. That sector contributes $41.5 billion to the province's economy and $17.7 billion to the gross domestic product.

Just recently, a study conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers showed us that, in 2019 dollars, and not at the cost of wood today, $150 is collected in taxes per cubic metre of processed wood. Of that amount, $50 is going to federal coffers. So investing in the forest sector is a win–win–win initiative. It is a win for the economy, for communities and for the environment.

A number of international studies emphasize the importance of an active and responsible forest industry. Among them are studies carried out by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, or FAO, and the International Energy Agency, or IEA. Added to those studies is the Natural Resources Canada annual report titled “The State of Canada's Forests”, which demonstrates that triple role.

So it goes without saying that we are happy the federal government is investing $3 billion over the coming years, so that two billion trees can be planted in the near future. However, a portion of those trees must be harvested eventually to enable sustainable forestry, which could make the most of the various iterations of that carbon neutral product. When a tree is cut down and sawn into planks, it sequesters its carbon longer than its counterparts left to themselves in the forest. In other words, when wood is used as a building material, its CO2 retention period is extended. It is a better alternative to other building materials, such as steel and concrete, which consume up to 34% more energy and emit 81% more GHGs.

Our industry is not short on challenges. The softwood lumber sector is booming, and the demand comes from the United States, Canada and from around the world.

However, the United States Department of Commerce imposes countervailing duties on softwood lumber imports from Canada. But the World Trade Organization, or WTO, concluded in its final report that Quebec is complying with international trade rules. We are counting on the Canadian government to use the WTO's conclusions and require an exemption from countervailing duties on products from public forests, an exclusion for businesses that mostly get their supply on the American side, and an integral refund of the money already collected.

When it comes to innovation, the panel sector and the pulp and paper sector are undergoing a complete transformation and are innovating constantly. Concerning panels, a great deal of research is going into the production of new green adhesives to meet consumer demand. The pulp and paper sector is no exception. A number of innovations have been announced over the past few months, including by FPInnovations, which uses cellulose in the manufacturing of products to fight against COVID-19.

So government support in research and development and in innovation is crucial, especially for FPInnovations, but also for the academic sector and for businesses, to help the industry make a shift and remain a leader in the new green economy.

We also think that using biomass in the heating sector must be done by adding depth to the stream, and not by cannibalizing existing businesses that are making value-added products.

In conclusion, we feel that the government must invest much more in the Investments in Forestry Industry Transformation program, the IFIT, because $55 million, the amount allocated over two years, is clearly insufficient.

Thank you.

Transcript

Discussions (0)