Madam Speaker, I would like to follow up on the question from my colleague from Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie.
The minister responsible for seniors is the one who led the debate in Quebec. When I spoke to her, she said that her government was obviously going to move forward, but that she thinks that it is a shame that the federal government will not follow suit for the reasons my colleague from Montcalm has just explained: the risks and fears it raises among some doctors.
What message is that sending? How sure can we be if there is a change of government? We know what the Conservatives think about medical aid in dying. What is going to happen with this law and the decisions that will be made in Quebec?
Madam Speaker, I would like to follow up on the question from my colleague from Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie.
The minister responsible for seniors is the one who led the debate in Quebec. When I spoke to her, she said that her government was obviously going to move forward, but that she thinks that it is a shame that the federal government will not follow suit for the reasons my colleague from Montcalm has just explained: the risks and fears it raises among some doctors.
What message is that sending? How sure can we be if there is a change of government? We know what the Conservatives think about medical aid in dying. What is going to happen with this law and the decisions that will be made in Quebec?